Apologies in advance: I finished this book a couple weeks ago and have long since returned it to the library. Hence, no quotes, which in this case I think will do the book a disservice.
Cheikh Anta Diop is most well-known in the United States as the man who demonstrated–his critics would say “argued”–that the ancient Egyptians were Black. This is true, he did make that argument, and I gather that this book, The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality, is the work in English that made his reputation. What is more important, though, about Diop’s work, is that he doesn’t simply demonstrate that the Egyptians were Black, he posits them as the cultural source of African civilization generally, as well as the source for many if not most of what are considered, in a standard Western Civ. course, ancient Greek innovations.
Depending on what company you’re in, you can just say the word, “Afrocentrism,” and get all kinds of reactions from white people that expose their unexamined racism. When in that situation, it’s good to have a book or two of Diop’s under your belt, because he provides the science behind the argument that the Egyptians were Black. It’s critical to remember that people still make a distinction between “white Africa” and “Black Africa,” even if they do it in the disguised form of “North Africa” and “Sub-Saharan Africa.” Note the Wikipedia links that show up for those terms, automatically suggested to me as I write this by a Firefox plugin I use. Anyone who dismisses how colonialist mainstream notions of Africa continue to be is kidding themselves.
Diop posits Africa as a whole, Black entity, which is one of his important points. Again, apologies for not having direct quotes in this piece, because it would be important here. I was pleased, reading the book, to see Diop use precisely the same language that I had on numerous occasions in the past. Many times, when discussing this stuff with people, I have been confronted with the argument that the Egyptians did not have the same notions of race as those in the modern United States, and so calling them “Black” is ahistorical and therefore misleading. I had often said to people that, yes, the Egyptians did not call themselves Negroes, but if you put them down in New York City, they’d live in Harlem. Dammit, but Diop uses the same argument, verbatim, in The African Origin of Civilization. I certainly felt a sense of gratification.
What is clear reading Diop is that all of this discussion is much more important for African people today, and by extension for the Black diaspora today, than it is for the Ancient Egyptians, who of course are long dead as physical beings. He has an endearing quality to his writing, insofar as I get the sense of him as an obviously exceptional, accomplished individual, cheering on other Africans and Black people of less obvious accomplishments, saying, “see those pyramids? That’s what you can do.” At some level, that’s his point. It shouldn’t need to be said, but with all the talk of “post-racial America” clearly needs to be, that that kind of discussion is still very, very important. The cultural assault (not to mention economic and legal) that Black people endure on a daily basis in this country is profound. Diop offers a way out.
Addendum, 1/18/11: great interview w/Diop on Youtube. Dig it: